whisky-dave wrote
Rod Speed wrote

as long as they are prepared to ignore note 2 which you've deleted.

note 2 is completely irrelevant to GSL, there is no pharmacist in a GSL.

Note 2: While several products have no legal limit for
the amount that may be sold or supplied, pharmacists
are expected to exercise professional control to limit the
amount of aspirin which may be stored in a patient's home

There is no pharmacist in a GSL.

So what.

So Note 2 is completely irrelevant to what is being
discussed, what is legal in a single GSL transaction.

Are you saying that you can buy as many as you want from a single outlet ?

Yes, with the effervescent and powder forms.
http://www.rpharms.com/legal-classif...atus-table.asp

And you are free to buy up to 100 with the other forms as well.

Neither note is relevant to the GSLs being discussed.

what GLS being discussed.

The ones where you are legally free to buy as many as you
like of the effervescent and powder forms and up to 100
of the other forms.

YOU made the claim.

YOU get to do the proving.

THAT'S how it works.

Seems like you made the claim first.

Says he carefully deleting from the quoting him making the claim first.

You're wrong, as always.
http://www.rpharms.com/legal-classif...atus-table.asp
Last couple of sections, just before the notes.

Yes the notes are the important points otherwise they wouldn't add them
would they.

They don't apply to the *GSL* sales we are discussing.