On 4/15/2014 3:10 PM, woodchucker wrote:
On 4/15/2014 2:45 PM, pentapus wrote:
On 4/13/2014 4:32 PM, woodchucker wrote:
On 4/13/2014 2:40 PM, Swingman wrote:
On 4/12/2014 2:09 PM, woodchucker wrote:


Judging from the way the subject was worded, thought you were talking
about something else entirely:

http://us.cdn001.fansshare.com/photo...-348438680.jpg






Yea, I don't get the popularity of the Kardashian's.. Losers if you ask
me...

For some, the best consolation for being a loser, is to have a ton of
money. How you get it, not as important.

It certainly is to me. I am not out to be a million or billionaire.

CEOs top the list of psychopaths:

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/drishti...udies-say-yes/

I
have known quite a few, and I really don't like most of them as people.
There are a couple of exceptions. Not sure if the money made them that
way, or the greed to get the money... I suspect its the greed.

I can't see where greed would make anyone a more agreeable person.

There are all kinds of people, and there are those (both rich and poor)
that measure their success in life by money and possessions. It's a
score keeper of sorts. Some/many people need to keep score in a very
conventional way, You and I don't.

For better or worse, I'm a convention breaker myself. The world doesn't
need many like that, but it does need a few.



I thought Kim looked pretty hot in that pic. There is something to be
said for eye candy.


I see nothing attractive about them. But to each his own.




--
pentapus