On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 20:42:00 -0500, Swingman wrote:
Most of the jury pool is sufficiently dumbed down to believe anything a
lawyer tells them; and it is unlikely that they have ever operated a
table saw, or even seen one, since shop classes were considered too
dangerous when they were little yuppies-in-training.

I've been wondering. We've all heard details of the law suits where
they've awarded large money amounts in non-SawStop tablesaw injuries.

Has anybody seen any statistics where awards have been minimal in
other similar types of law suits?

In other words, how many similar suits have been a failure because
jurors were not sufficiently dumbed down?