On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 20:12:54 -0700, Tony Hwang
wrote:

Oren wrote:
On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 07:48:52 -0500, Stormin Mormon
wrote:


At least the Canadians don't send us millions
of diseased people who want taxpayer money.

Of course, that's mostly account of our US
gov, who practices trap and release, and who
dispenses taxpayer money to illegals. What
you fund, increases. Stop funding, and it
fades away.

Get off your high horse here, Chris. Disease is not a part of allowing
immigration; nor a policy to preclude entry. It used to be many years
ago..."prohibited the entry of “any convict, lunatic, idiot, or any
person unable to take care of himself or herself without becoming a
public charge."

http://immigrationinamerica.org/584-immigration-act-of-1882.html

Tell us about how Haitians with medical problems (TB), or Cubans with
mental disorders should be denied entry (1980).

Both have died landing on our shores. Need some examples?

Hmmm,
In the name of humanity or refugee?

The last immigration policy, practice and law I read in 79/85 was that
Haitians that came ashore were to be deported. Cubans were allowed to
stay because they touched the shores escaping under Castro. Many
Haitians, from Key West to West Palm Beach died in rickety stolen
boats, drowned and floated ashore.

Haitians escaping former polices of ""Papa Doc" Duvalier were to be
sent back.

....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariel_Boatlift

http://ibiartpompano.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/haitians-head-to-florida-in-sailboat-by-floridausaimages-com_.jpg

http://aliciapatterson.org/sites/default/files/styles/node_image/public/Millman01_0.jpg

"...When Bill Clinton became president in 1993, he continued Bush's
policy. He argued that prohibiting the immigration of Haitian refugees
would prevent many Haitians from drowning in an attempted ocean
crossing."

http://crfimmigrationed.org/index.php/lessons-for-teachers/148-hl9