Thread: Stayin' Warm
View Single Post
  #48   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
DerbyDad03 DerbyDad03 is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14,845
Default Stayin' Warm

wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:25:03 +0000 (UTC), DerbyDad03
wrote:

wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 23:47:10 +0000 (UTC), DerbyDad03
wrote:

wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jan 2014 03:22:59 +0000 (UTC), DerbyDad03
wrote:

Stormin Mormon wrote:
On 1/7/2014 11:34 AM, Snag wrote:

The camper loses a lot of heat , it was never meant for winter use . But
we've got a few thousand trees , quite a lot of standing and downed dead
wood . That should get me thru the winter , we'll be better prepared next
year . And we DID leave a faucet dripping , just not quite enough flow .
My truck too is on the charger , wouldn't kick over earlier . I also hung
a 75W incan light bulb down between the rad and motor and threw a cover over
the hood area . I had slush in the radiator , but apparently not enough in
the motor to lock up the water pump .

Sorry to hear the cold is giving you trouble.
I wonder if I have any filament light bulbs I
can leave under the hood. Today I did use a
ceramic space heater to help thaw pipes.

My truck won't start on ether, so my main
mechanic suggests some heat on the distributor
cap, in case there is water in there.


I'm not bragging or anything, but it was -2 this morning and both my '04
and my wife's '05 started with one push of the remote from my nice warm
living room. My daughter had to go out and start her '02, but it turned
over on the first try.

My wife's car usually stalls right after starting when it's below 20 or so,
but the remote automatically tries again and it always stays running on the
second try.

I've never had a car, that didn't have something wrong with it, that
didn't start, even below -20F. I have had batteries fail,
unexpectedly (well, I should have expected) at much higher
temperatures but if the car is in good working order it should start
at much temperatures *much* below what you've seen.

I know I'm wasting gas/money, but it's safer to drive when you're not
shivering. ;-)

I don't like them because I've been burned by them killing the
battery. No thanks.

Why do you say "them"? Didn't you once say:

"We've had one. That was enough to cure me of that particular laziness."

It's a well known problem. They (after market) will void warranties.


First - WTF? Where did I say anything about warranties?


Good lord, what an idiot! They void the warranties because it's a
well known problem.

I quoted a line
form one of your posts regarding the "one" remote starter you had and then
asked why you said "I've burned by _them_ killing the battery."


*THEY* kill batteries. It was not a single starter that killed a
battery. It's is a common problem with them. *I* had that
experience, as well. You *really* are stupid.

It was a
single vs. multiple question. Did you bring up warranties to avoid
answering the specific question I asked?


Good Lord, you're an idiot.

Liar?

Stupid? Illiterate? Sure, of course you are.


Mirror mirror on the wall...


The typical argument of the lying lefty; IKWYABWAI. You must be
another of Malformed's sockpuppets. How does his hand up your ass
feel?


The fact that you appear to actually believe the crap you write would be
funny if it wasn't so pitiful.

You are arguing against a point that I never made. "They void the
warranties because it's a well known problem."

Show me one post where I brought up the warranty issue. If you want to play
games with wording around "one" and "them", fine, because that is the one
and only point I was making. However, bringing up an issue that I never
even mentioned appears to be nothing more than a way to avoid the actual
point be argued. I'll try one more time to see if you can actually stay on
point. It's actually not much more than a Yes or No question:

In one thread, did you say ""We've had _one_. That was enough to cure me of
that particular laziness" and then in another thread say "I've been burned
by _them_ killing the battery."

Yes or no?