On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 21:16:00 +0000 (UTC),
(Larry W) wrote:

In article ,
Gordon Shumway wrote:
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 05:06:53 +0000 (UTC),
(Larry W) wrote:

In article ,
Stormin Mormon wrote:
This article says soldering is less desirable
than crimps for Anderson Power Pole terminals.


http://www.survivalblog.com/2013/12/...ectronics.html

I was taught that soldering is far better than crimp.
What's your thoughts?

--
.
Christopher A. Young
Learn about Jesus
www.lds.org
.

While personal preference plays a large part in this choice, it is perhaps
worth noting that autombile and truck manufacturers, aircraft manufacturers,
and even aerospace industry, including the space shuttle builders among
others, all crimp rather than solder their wire connectors and terminals.

Your inclusion of truck manufacturers is definitely wrong. I
guarantee that Caterpillar crimps and solders all of the connectors
and terminals except where solder will prevent the terminal from
seating properly in its' housing. Caterpillar builds trucks.

I suspect your list may have included other manufacturers in error.

If we're going to quibble about the practices of a single manufacturer, then
perhaps it's also worth noting that Cat has only been producing on-highway
trucks since 2011. And while I have not professionally worked on their
construction equipkment in over 30 years, and only rarely see a Caterpillar
engine in my current job (Mostly Mack, Navistar, Cummins, DDA/Sterling
& Freightliner BTW) I can guarantee you that the Cat connectors I have
personally seen and worked on have all been crimped, not soldered.

Well, if we're going to quibble, one would think it prudent to notice
the phrase "except where solder will prevent the terminal from
seating properly in its' housing" I had in my reply.

So, your point is?