On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 06:33:35 -0700, wrote:

On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:12:15 -0700, RobertMacy
wrote:

...snip....
I personally do not believe that OJ did that crime.

Speaking of deaf...

Several reasons: OJ
was football player, from being around them, they use their hands when
angry and frustrated. They would simply pound people silly, not stab,
they're just not 'tool' type people. Plus a 'proffessional knifer' keeps
his knife as in the weapon was never found. Importantly there are
indications two people perpetrated the crime, not one. The man killed
was
a 'look alike' not the intended target to have been included. During the
trial, met OJ's people at his home in BelAir and people one hires are a
reflection of themselves, outstanding individuals of high integtrity.
Can't believe OJ did the crime. Later, after acquittal down in LA, met M
Clark [that was ONE bitter lady!] and felt like taking a shower
afterwards, some people just leave you feeling like that.

Clueless.

Guilty, or innocent? Not for me to judge really.

Sure it is. "Guilty" or "not guilty", no, that isn't in your
contract.


Besides the obvious observation that people ascribe to others what they
themselves have done/will do/are capable of.

And, I thought *I* was opinionated!