"J. Clarke" wrote in message
...
Frank Ketchum wrote:


"J. Clarke" wrote in message
...

Please identify one individual who didn't get their hand cut off
because
the
Sawstop worked.


It is not a widely used product yet. How can you demand results from
something not being used yet? He is saying if the thing is ramrodded
down
our throats then there will most certainly eventually be people who
benefit
from it by not being injured. He is quite correct about that, there is
no
doubt. That doesn't mean, however that it should be a requirement any
machinery.

He _said_
"for every fool that thinks they are invincible and may get hurt due to
lack of respect, there are others (more people) that didnt get their hand
cut off because the sawstop worked."

I'm merely attempting to ascertain the actual corporeal existence of at
least one of these "others". Perhaps he meant something other than what
he
said. If so, he should have recognized that his phrasing was the source
of
my confusion and clarified.

Frank

you arent trying to ascertain anything. you are stating as fact that
sawstop doesnt work and doesnt exist. and ducking proving by trying to put
me on the defensive.

what i was responding to was a question about whether or not more injuries
would occur because people put too much trust in the system. which i think
is false. im not claiming any actual hands were saved or cut off. im just
saying that just because people use safety goggles and splitters it doesnt
cause more accidents because they become complacent, and same with the
sawstop. go back and check it out if you dont believe me. i think had you
bothered to read the thread as it played out, it would be clear. it took
quite a stretch to get us this far frank.. lets see how much further you can
stretch it g

randy