Frank Ketchum wrote:


"J. Clarke" wrote in message
...

Please identify one individual who didn't get their hand cut off because
the
Sawstop worked.


It is not a widely used product yet. How can you demand results from
something not being used yet? He is saying if the thing is ramrodded down
our throats then there will most certainly eventually be people who
benefit
from it by not being injured. He is quite correct about that, there is no
doubt. That doesn't mean, however that it should be a requirement any
machinery.

He _said_
"for*every*fool*that*thinks*they*are*invincible*an d*may*get*hurt*due to
lack of respect, there are others (more people) that didnt get their hand
cut off because the sawstop worked."

I'm merely attempting to ascertain the actual corporeal existence of at
least one of these "others". Perhaps he meant something other than what he
said. If so, he should have recognized that his phrasing was the source of
my confusion and clarified.

Frank

--
--John
Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)