View Single Post
  #95   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
The Natural Philosopher[_2_] The Natural Philosopher[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 39,563
Default A rather disturbing website...

On 27/08/13 08:41, dennis@home wrote:
On 26/08/2013 23:08, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 26/08/13 22:29, dennis@home wrote:
On 26/08/2013 20:22, Tim Streater wrote:
In article ,
(Andrew Gabriel) wrote:

In article ,
Tim Streater writes:
In article ,
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
How else can BT know where to vector the actual ATM conversation?
I would have expected that, with one end in my local exchange, the
other end on the ISP's router, BT would use their management
software to set up a VC between those points over their ATM
network,
and that would be it as far as their involvement was concerned.
However, giggling for "BT Radius Server" appears to indicate
that it
doesn't work like that; perhaps the simple approach doesn't scale.

It doesn't actually know who your ISP is until your router tries to
login.
If you reconfigure your router with the login details for another
person
using a different ISP (but also on BT wholesale), you will find
you can
login to their ISP on your line just like you normally log in to
yours.

So the ATM circuit is built on the fly? That would make some sense.


Its done at the IP layer.
The customers ATM circuit does not get as far as the ISP on the ADSL
services.

I think it does. The circuits are delivered via ATM to the ISP. Not
via Ethernet.


Just because the link to the ISP is over ATM doesn't mean subscribers
ATM circuits are presented at the ISP end.
They could be delivered via ethernet

Indeed they could, But I dont think they are in fact.

not unless you are on 21CN arrangement.



BT routes no packet at the IP level at all for 'customer ISPs'
You can tell that with a traceroute.

Next hop is always somewhere in the ISPs 'virtual' machine room./


And?


so the concept of association of IP with a distinct geographical area
simply does not exist.

--
Ineptocracy

(in-ep-toc-ra-cy) €“ a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.