In article ,
Kurt Ullman wrote:

In article ,
Free Lunch wrote:


The belief that there is no god. You can't prove it any more than the
other side can prove there is ONE.

You do know that you have offered a strawman to attack, do you not?

No I haven't, not all. It is a fundamental part of the issue. How can
you be so overwhelmingly sure that your essential unprovable belief (or
lack of belief if you want to go that route) is the one and only True

Who says we do? Who said anything even close to that? The exact words,
please.


One yet you can't prove your lack of belief is any more right than the
other sides is? Especially since many want to say so vicerously and
stridently and with every bit as much as loud as those on the other side
proclaim their's?
You can no more prove your lack of belief is right and warranted
than the other side can their' is right and warranted.

How can a lack of belief be right or wrong?

--

JD

"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden