harry wrote:
On May 8, 2:25 pm, whisky-dave wrote:
On Wednesday, May 8, 2013 1:58:11 PM UTC+1, Mentalguy2k8 wrote:
"whisky-dave" wrote in message

...

According to the ONS, black people make up only 3.3% of the
population of

England and Wales, with whites making up 86%.

Why pick just England and wales ?

Even then those percentages don't reflect the real balance.

What source(s) are you using?

Not the ones you are obviously.
WQe could take teh scum as one example

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...ex-fiend-Brita...

Why are tehre so many in the North of England considering the far
lower numbers of black people.
Unfortunalty they don;t seem to list offenders by skin colour.
but some clues are here
" There is a clear regional divide, with a higher density of sex
offenders located in the North compared with the South.

Yet most predators per capita are based in the West Midlands.

The region where there are fewest sex offenders per capita is the
East of England (64.22 per 100,000 population). Perhaps
surprisingly, London has the second fewest — at 64.53 per 100,000.

Now the London and south east have a higher proportion of black
people than the midlands or the north so why don;t the number of sex
crimes follow that trend ?

Dream on. Birmingham and the North of England is full of Pakistanis.
You know, the ones that go around grooming and raping white girls.
I think nearly a hundred have been convicted by now.

Or have you conveniently forgotten this?

The most fascist country is India/Pakistan

That India/Pakistan country you mentioned. Is that country where the Indians
and Pakistanis are good friends with each other and they all share the same
religion?

--
Adam