On May 8, 2:25*pm, whisky-dave wrote:
On Wednesday, May 8, 2013 1:58:11 PM UTC+1, Mentalguy2k8 wrote:
"whisky-dave" wrote in message

...

According to the ONS, black people make up only 3.3% of the population of

England and Wales, with whites making up 86%.

Why pick just England and wales ?

Even then those percentages don't reflect the real balance.

What source(s) are you using?

Not the ones you are obviously.
WQe could take teh scum as one example

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...ex-fiend-Brita...

*Why are tehre so many in the North of England considering the far lower numbers of black people.
Unfortunalty they don;t seem to list offenders by skin colour.
*but some clues are here
" There is a clear regional divide, with a higher density of sex offenders located in the North compared with the South.

Yet most predators per capita are based in the West Midlands.

The region where there are fewest sex offenders per capita is the East of England (64.22 per 100,000 population). Perhaps surprisingly, London has the second fewest — at 64.53 per 100,000.

Now the London and south east have a higher proportion of black people than the midlands or the north so why don;t the number of sex crimes *follow that trend ?

Dream on. Birmingham and the North of England is full of Pakistanis.
You know, the ones that go around grooming and raping white girls.
I think nearly a hundred have been convicted by now.

Or have you conveniently forgotten this?

The most fascist country is India/Pakistan where around half a million
babies are murdered every year because they are girls.
Because there is a shortage of women, there is a rape problem there.

Or have you forgotten this too?