On Apr 22, 4:36*pm, Ed Huntress wrote:
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:25:07 -0700 (PDT), Jonathan Banquer









wrote:
On Apr 22, 1:53 pm, "PrecisionmachinisT"
wrote:
"jon_banquer" wrote in ...
the reality of what iggy's problem is

It's not a "problem" for iggy....

He's just acting stupid, (and cleverly so) in order to profit from all the gullible folks who are apparently eager to waste their own time spoon-feeding him with information that he could easily figure out on his own if he were so inclined.

-easy to feel sorry for someone in a wheelchair; only slightly less than for someone who posts on usenet using the nym "ignoramus", if you catch my drift...

The problem IMO is when someone is always provided with the "easy answer", their reasoning, problem solving, and decision making skills generally suffer substantially as a result.

Count on Ed Huntress totally ignoring what you posted just like he
ignores the facts about what the Pimple and KiddingNoOne are.

There is most definitely a reason Ed won't do the small amount of
research need to confirm facts. The facts would blow the nonsense and
bull**** Ed frequently posts to smithereens. Ed honed his craft of
ignoring and not wanting to know the real truth writing for
advertising based magazines as well as writing ad copy over many
years. You always pay a price for selling out. How Ed thinks and
operates shows just how badly selling out for years and years has
effected him.

Pfffhhhht!

Go **** in your hat. How's that for a small amount of research?

--
Ed Huntress

Your wearing the hat I **** in before I gave it to you. You will
proudly keep wearing it while attempting to be a smarmy.

Please enjoy my hat and continue to wear it proudly.