On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 07:33:40 -0500, Ed Huntress
wrote:

On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 21:12:20 -0600, F. George McDuffee
wrote:

On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 11:51:05 -0500, Ed Huntress
wrote:


snip
No. But outlawing the practice of walking through town...
snip

================


The problem is that no one has any data on what the real
problem(s) are, only on the means and tools immediately used
in creating these incidents.

That's all interesting, George, but while you're fishing around in the
dustbins of pharmacology, don't forget that there are two things going
on today that play into the desires of people suffering from some
kinds of mental illnesses and distress: First, if you really need
attention (and many of them do), we have cable news and the Internet,
by which your glorious revenge will be played around the world in a
couple of hours; second, we have tools available today that can really
make a big splash.

A hundred years ago, your military Trapdoor Springfield wasn't going
to do the job that you can do today with a Bushmaster M4 look-alike.
And the news wasn't likely to get past your county line.

It's a qualitatively different situation, and it doesn't require
pharmacology to explain it.

snip

Once again a Lefty confuses the symptoms with the disease.

Im going to have to knock a bunch of IQ points of Eds resume for that
bit of buffoonery.

Shrug

Gunner

The methodology of the left has always been:

1. Lie
2. Repeat the lie as many times as possible
3. Have as many people repeat the lie as often as possible
4. Eventually, the uninformed believe the lie
5. The lie will then be made into some form oflaw
6. Then everyone must conform to the lie