wrote:
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 11:06:07 PM UTC-5, Bill wrote:
wrote:

On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:56:22 PM UTC-5, Bill wrote:
wrote:
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:22:25 PM UTC-5, Bill wrote:
wrote:
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 9:00:41 PM UTC-5, Bill wrote:
Scott Lurndal wrote:
writes:
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:52:00 PM UTC-5, Bill wrote:
wrote:
Part 1:
http://www.garagewoodworks.com/video...4&category=all
Part 2:
http://www.garagewoodworks.com/video.php?video=75
Almost done. Critiques welcomed.
I couldn't read it because your page requires Javascript to be turned
on(why?)
Because the page uses javascript. It's too much work to code for the few knuckleheads that have it turned off.
Was the pejorative necessary?
Denigrating a potential audience is counter-productive, and will reduce your advertising income.
This must be the varmint here!
...http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com...how_afd_ads.js
What is that? And how is this relevant?
My browser downloaded it from your website. I just didn't run it. I
couldn't make stuff like that up! : )
I'll double-check if you want.
That file does not exist on my website. And the link you posted is not my website. Nor do I refer any user to the link you posted.
I'm suspect it just got "ajax'ed" in. I am not an expert (that's why
I'm careful). Blame Mozilla; I just chose "View Page Info".
Which page of mine did you "View Page Info" on where that link appears?
Paste the url here.
You've changed your page tonight. It's not there now.
Please! It never was there. You are living up to my original thoughts of you up in the thread.

Sorryto say it, but your "policy"speaks for itself. I marked the page
"untrusted".
Of course, I don't confuse the page with the person.