On 1/26/2013 3:31 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 15:29:38 -0500, Phil Hobbs
wrote:

On 1/26/2013 1:05 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:53:37 -0500, Phil Hobbs
wrote:

On 01/26/2013 12:18 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
What are these nodes?

http://tinyurl.com/bjxndpg

...Jim Thompson

AC analysis relies on linearity, so all signals are noninteracting.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

AC analysis is indeed "small signal". That doesn't negate the fact
that the analysis finds a frequency misbehavior.

And I don't have a clue what your "non-interacting" means. Sounds
like BS to me :-}

I'll run a transient analysis and prove it to you.

Sorry "prove" is the wrong word. Some on this group think their
opinion outweighs science.

...Jim Thompson

I agree that running a simulation doesn't prove a whole lot by itself,
but then I don't have a dog in this fight.

"Non-interacting" means what it says--in a perfectly linear system, the
response to any combination of stimuli, applied wherever you like,
equals the sum of the responses to each stimulus alone.

PhD-ish for the superposition theorem ?:-)


I do build a whole lot of bootstraps, though.

Whoopee Doo! I build thousands of cascoded mirrors.


You really are pretty torqued about this, aren't you?

Cheers

Phil Hobbs


--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics

160 North State Road #203
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 USA
+1 845 480 2058

hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net