On 9/7/2012 7:39 PM, Wells Fargo wrote:
The Daring Dufas used improper usenet message composition style by
unnecessarily full-quoting:

That little mistake by Wells Fargo Bank is going to cost the bank a
great deal of money. In another country, the couple who's property
was stolen might not be compensated very much if at all. O_o

What a maroon you are if you believe that.

Your US Banksters probably have a law on the books protecting them
against being prosecuted for this sort of theivery (they certainly do
for other types of theivery they perform on you serfs on a daily basis).


Absolutely not you moron, the people working for the bank broke more
than one law. It's a given that there will be civil prosecution but
I'm not a lawyer or legal expert so I've no idea what criminal sanctions
can be pursued and against whom. There is a little thing called "intent"
and it may turn out that the bank employee responsible for the cluster
coitus is just an incompetent pile of excreta. I can't comment on the
variety of human responsible but with corporations having to deal with
Politically Correct hiring practices and promotions, the idiot bank
employee was more than likely hired after HR rejected someone with a
much higher IQ. O_o

TDD