Gunner Asch wrote:

On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 14:21:41 -0700, Delvin Benet ýt wrote:

On 8/7/2012 2:10 PM, Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Delvin Benet wrote:

That is a recipe for fraud. You could put all the safeguards you can
imagine in place, and still the material would be defective or not even
there.


So, material stock that is constantly rotated would all be
defective? OK.

I think it would at least be sub-standard. It would be sold to the
government as top quality, then pilfered for use to which it is suited.

People selling stuff to the government rarely go broke doing it.

People selling stuff to the government rarely sell them stuff less than
spec. Those that do, go to prison.


Or they die when the substandard crap goes bad before it's shipped.