On 7/7/2012 4:43 PM, Leon wrote:
On 7/7/2012 2:03 PM, Jack wrote:
On 7/4/2012 10:53 AM, -MIKE- wrote:

Thank God Al Gore forced us all to use CFL's so now we'll get less
exposure to mercury.
+1

Why is it that people who want to erode others liberties can blindly
trust the public to act responsibly when it supports their agenda, but
not when it comes to things they don't like, such as guns, fatty/sugary
foods, and my "carbon footprint?"
+1

Your only error was in listening to news reports.
+2

KRW wrote:
There is a difference between "warning" and "lying". A scientist should
know this difference. Don't you agree?
+1

Nah, the left doesn't want to solve anything. If a problem gets solved,
it can't be taxed.
+1

Larry Wrote:
A now infamous institution, they were caught with their pants down in
an attempt to defraud the public and, probably, to secure more funding
as a result. It was agenda-based, not science-based. IMO, there is
no worse crime a scientist can commit, against the public, against
himself, and against science. Algore is such a criminal. He openly
stated that he had to fudge the results "to get people to listen, and
to act."

I spit on their grandmothers' shadows.
+2

Leon wrote:
You are using sensationalized data.
+1

Mike 4, KRW 2, Larry 2, Leon 1

Mike wins!


I guess 4th is better than last! ;~)

Yeah Scott, I know it looks like 4th is last. OK Buddy?

I didn't list the fractional points, and certainly not the negative
points. Only the ones that tickled my senses in a good way, that I
could recall. I may have cheated KRW out of a point by only giving him
one point for the left not being able to tax solved problems, that, in
retrospect was worth two, but sorry, too late now, the count is in:-)

--
Jack
Add Life to your Days not Days to your Life.
http://jbstein.com