On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 19:04:47 +0100, "ARWadsworth"
wrote:

H. Neary wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 17:31:13 +0100, "ARWadsworth"
wrote:

H. Neary wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 14:59:55 +0100, tony sayer
wrote:

The idiot must really be short of a few brain cells.

I would have
screamed in agony, rolled on the floor till the
ambulance arrived, had a month off work [ Or at the
very least four working days], and also contacted the
police and a solicitor.
So are you are saying that you could not manage to plug
in a 110V extension lead to a 110V transformer?
No of couse not!

I'm saying that I would take full advantage of any physical
assault against me.

HN

Well you're an idiot then. We lost a very good lecturer in
college recently because some **** reported him for giving
him a quick poke when telling him to get off his phone, no
harm was caused by the 'poke' and the guy wasn't even meant
to be on his phone anyway!!! So now, one of our units is gone
completely tits up until this mess is sorted.


That sort of thing happened where I worked when I was younger
and in a way was expected behaviour and accepted and at school
as well..

I seriously don't think it did me and anyone I worked with and
was at school with any harm at all, just we learnt to behave and
respect others that bit quicker...

And No its no excuse for long term systematic abuse anywhere
either...

There is a separation between the two..

There is no seperation. Physical assault doesn't become acceptable
just because it is a one off.

Poking someone for ****ing around with their mobile phone is NOT
assault.

It most certainly is!

Try poking the next person you see using a mobile, you may welol find
out how erronious that statement is.


It's not assault if I am charge of the person using the phone.

Rubbish!


HN