Scott Lurndal wrote:
tiredofspam nospam.nospam.com writes:
Because it's stupid.
The label can cause cancer in California.

Why doesn't California just put out a blanket statement that anything
can cause cancer but only in California. :-)

Please point out a single example of a warning label that doesn't
apply to
a known toxin. No anecdotal evidence allowed, you must show that
the chemical (or chemical residue) being warned about is not part of
the labelled item.

scott

(my only concern with the warning labels is the 'cried wolf' syndrome
vis-a-vis extremely low concentration levels).

Hello....

--

-Mike-