View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
George Plimpton George Plimpton is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 973
Default Non-black version of "The Talk"

On 4/9/2012 1:53 PM, wrote:
On Apr 9, 1:23 pm, George wrote:


Get back to the point. There is a statistically significant difference
in the mean IQ of whites and blacks. What about it?

Leave out your left-wing ideological bull****, and just address that fact.


There is a difference. But it is not all bad. I believe one of the
differences is that the blacks with high IQ's tend to have much higher
IQ's.

One thing that may cause the statistical difference is that the
culture of blacks in high school is to put down intellectual
accomplishments. Whereas the culture of whites in high school is to
admire intellectual accomplishments. And the culture of Asian parents
is to demand intellectual accomplishments.


That can't be it. IQ does not measure what people have learned; it
measures ability to learn. IQ tests are administered beginning at ages
well below where the anti-scholastic social values of blacks begin to
set the tone in school.


But regardless of any statistical difference, it is obviously wrong to
judge individuals based on statistics about groups. A kid with an IQ
of 150 is a kid with an IQ of 150 regardless of what race the kid is.


Correct. The point that Derbyshire was making is that when encountering
a black "civil" "servant" in a government office, a rational expectation
is that employee will be less intelligent than if she were white, and so
less likely to be competent. Based on the different means and the
distribution of intelligence, that's undoubtedly true. That difference
in mean IQ of whites and blacks does not address why the black "civil"
"servant" is more likely to be aggressively rude.