"John Fields" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:52:39 -0000, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:39:04 -0000, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:58:16 -0000, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
news:sckkm753fo4edq24u4j8omlibdl06t744d@4ax. com...
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:51:49 -0000, "Ian Field"
wrote:

Sometimes I can't resist winding up loonies like Philthy - JT just
fell
within the homing envelope.

---
If you think Phil is loony, then you don't have enough time in grade
here, or technical expertise, to be thinking of yourself as a judge.

Besides, if you really thought that Phil was a loon, instead of
extending a helping hand, why would you want to wind him up and
cause
him unwarranted pain and a greater retreat into loonness?

Perhaps to assuage your own sense of inadequacy by trying to bring
your betters down to your level?

Homing envelope?

As far as your vendetta against JT goes, here you are with a dead
shop
which you can't even use to verify data you've begged for and, yet
again, choose to besmirch those whom you don't/can't understand.

Philthy likes to scream and rant at everyone (especially newbies who
can
be
put off usenet by it!) but he's not so great at taking it - which is
often
entertaining to watch.

---
Entertainment, then, according to you, is watching something
unpleasant happen to someone other than yourself?

Phil has a very low tolerance for bull**** and poorly constructed
queries and has no compunction whatever in using all the tools at his
disposal in order to discredit whatever looks bogus to him.

In my experience, if you disagree with Phil, politely, and state the
reasons for your disagreement, a rational discussion can ensue.
---

JT is slowly drifting in that general direction.

---
You make those kinds of generalizations all the time without producing
the slightest shred of evidence to back up your claims.

There's no need to make a presentation of what's already there for all
to
see.

---
So now you're saying that what you think you see is what everyone else
sees?


There's none so blind as them who don't want to see!!!

---
Ignoratio elenchi.

--
JF

Well it would be to someone who isn't too bright.