On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:58:16 -0000, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:51:49 -0000, "Ian Field"
wrote:

Sometimes I can't resist winding up loonies like Philthy - JT just fell
within the homing envelope.

---
If you think Phil is loony, then you don't have enough time in grade
here, or technical expertise, to be thinking of yourself as a judge.

Besides, if you really thought that Phil was a loon, instead of
extending a helping hand, why would you want to wind him up and cause
him unwarranted pain and a greater retreat into loonness?

Perhaps to assuage your own sense of inadequacy by trying to bring
your betters down to your level?

Homing envelope?

As far as your vendetta against JT goes, here you are with a dead shop
which you can't even use to verify data you've begged for and, yet
again, choose to besmirch those whom you don't/can't understand.

Philthy likes to scream and rant at everyone (especially newbies who can be
put off usenet by it!) but he's not so great at taking it - which is often
entertaining to watch.

---
Entertainment, then, according to you, is watching something
unpleasant happen to someone other than yourself?

Phil has a very low tolerance for bull**** and poorly constructed
queries and has no compunction whatever in using all the tools at his
disposal in order to discredit whatever looks bogus to him.

In my experience, if you disagree with Phil, politely, and state the
reasons for your disagreement, a rational discussion can ensue.
---

JT is slowly drifting in that general direction.

---
You make those kinds of generalizations all the time without producing
the slightest shred of evidence to back up your claims.


--
JF