OT Is the George Plimpton who posts here an artificial intelligencebot?
On 3/16/2012 12:54 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
Yeah, what you do is talk as if you know things when you haven't a
clue.
No, I don't. Can't you read, ****wit? What did I just write? I said
that
I never talk about what I know - I talk about what you *don't* know
despite pretending you do, and how that leads you to spout a bunch of
bull****.
Your only problem is that you haven't any idea what I don't know.
I don't know what you don't know until you start pretending to know
something that I can tell you don't.
But since I never have pretended to know something that I don't that
would make what you claim impossible.
You claim all the time to know stuff you don't really know. I always
point it out and kick your ass for it.
You can add that you don't know what I know either.
I know that you don't know the difference between males and females. You
keep confusing Bob Dole and Elizabeth Dole, you stupid ****.
Here's what you have told everyone, that you don't know that when a
married man is a multimillionaire so is his spouse.
You said *Bob* Dole was in the Senate in 2008. You were wrong - you
didn't know what you were talking about.
Hawke-Ptooey:
"As for being wealthy, Roll Call, the capital hill newspaper, has
*him* listed in their list of the richest 50 members of congress in
2008 with a net worth of 16.45 million." [emphasis added]
You ****ed up, yet again.
Trivial bull****. No wonder that is all you focus on. Was Bob Dole in
the senate for decades? Yes. Did he make millions *while* in the senate?
Yes. Is he a rich senator? Yes. Are both he and his wife
multimillionaires? Yes. So who gives a **** if I said him not her when I
referred to the article? No one but a twerp like you.
Hawke
|