On 2/15/2012 2:17 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 2/15/2012 1:02 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 2/15/2012 11:31 AM, Hawke wrote:
On 2/14/2012 8:34 PM, David R. Birch wrote:
On 2/14/2012 2:51 PM, Hawwke-Ptooey wrote:
On 2/13/2012 6:18 PM, David R. Birch wrote:

I'm curious(but not yellow...)

Does anyone, left or right, red or blue, authoritarian or libertarian
take Hawwke-Ptooey seriously?

As in making a useful contribution to any discussion he intrudes
into?

Demonstrating in any way that he is well educated, as opposed to
having
a poli sci BA from a mediocre school?

A simple Yes, he's a scholar or No, he's a buffoon will suffice.

David



And the proof that you are anything but average is?


Hawwke-Ptooey

What would you accept as proof?

Of course, anybody reading our exchanges would have no trouble
recognizing your mediocrity.


But the easiest thing for them to pick up on is your sense of
superiority,

He doesn't exhibit any such sense. He's merely pointing out that you are
a mediocrity with an inflated sense of your intellect. You are the
*classic* example of the Dunning-Kruger effect.


Yeah,

Yeah.