On Jan 24, 7:42*pm, Bill Wright wrote:
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
You also should consider the difference between setting out to kill
someone and the possible result of a simple theft.

Thank you Mr Spart. But the vast majority of people, those who have
decent common-sense values, will have no truck with your apologist *drivel.
These nasty little criminals are totally selfish. They don't care what
effect their actions have on others. They are not a part of society
because they have opted out, so why should society bend over backwards
to accommodate them?
They break into the homes of good hard-working people, make a phenomenal
mess, **** on the carpet, and smash the place up. They buy and sell
drugs, thus ruining millions of lives. They steal a tenner's worth of
copper despite the fact that the cost per affected household to repair
the damage is often hundreds of pounds.
They are like rats amongst us, with the morality of rats, sub-human,
leaving their filthy trail of oudure everywhere.
The cost to the rest of us in terms of heartbreak when homes are
burgled, inconvenience, and money spent of jails and the police is
astronomic.
So you can't expect decent people to show them much consideration in
return. The judicial system has failed us thanks to being watered down
by lefties over the years, so decent people can only think that the more
of the little scumbags that kill themselves the better off the rest of
us will be.
The simple answer to the ballooning costs of the prisons would be to
take the tellys out of the cells, turn the heating down to 18deg, and
link food provided to work done. That way the prison population would
soon reduce.
All burglaries and assaults should result in an automatic custodial
sentence.

Bill

Well said Bill!