On 24/01/2012 16:20, Clive George wrote:
On 24/01/2012 14:40, ®i©ardo wrote:
On 24/01/2012 12:58, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article366dnc6WufS2CIPSnZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@giganews. com,
wrote:
Of course not. Didn't think you were human.


Well, given your twisted outlook on life that's hardly surprising. Let
us praise and nurture the wrong-doers, because it would be unjust to to
do otherwise, even if everyone else suffers as a result of their
actions.

If it's a twisted outlook on life hoping a petty thief doesn't get
killed
for whatever reason I'm happy to be 'twisted'.

Those who want the ultimate penalty for such things rarely stop there,
given the chance. But then you're obviously too thick to work this out.


Your attitude seems to be: "F*ck the thousands of innocent people who
potentially suffer because of attacks of wanton vandalism and theft such
as these, it is far better that they do so than the guilty be punished
in any way - even if it be by their own stupidity".

Don't talk ****e. Nobody is saying that there should be no punishment,
only that the death penalty is inappropriate.

Nobody wished it upon them, it was totally self-inflicted, they weren't
forced to do it. Darwinism in action, out of everyone's hands except
their own.

--
Moving things in still pictures