On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:48:41 -0800, John Larkin
wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:45:17 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:25:05 -0800, John Larkin
wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:01:29 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:
[snip]
Of course there are no values yet. One has to agree on function and
architecture first.
Then why did you "diss" me when I immediately had a behavioral
switcher architecture RUNNING in SIMULATION?
Because it was a trivial theoretical cartoon, in fact just some
waveforms. And it was a variable-duty-cycle switcher, which is *not*
what you ultimately posted. In other words, it was all show but
useless to the discussion at hand.
[snip]
Oh! Finally I see... if _I_ run an architectural behavioral
simulation showing that the scheme will work, it's a "cartoon".
On the other hand, if _you_ make a hand sketch, by _declaration_,
that's the only proper way?
John, You really do need to see a mental health professional.
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice
480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at
http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.