On Dec 22, 10:27*pm, "Existential Angst" wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Jones_(radio_host)

He's sorta like Rush Limbaugh (in looks, as well!), a li'l strident, *but
unlike Limbaugh, he is not addicted to oxycontin, and may actually be right
(as in correct) in his world view.

Last time I checked, Rush's problem with oxycontin was
many years ago and corrected, not current.


Limbaugh is a cocksucking pandering sycophant, who proly pays big bucks for
a wet nurse with an enema kit.
Jones is just a little grating at times.

Just a little grating? Jones is a raving lunatic who comes up
with the most absurd and totally bizarre conspiracy theories
for almost everything and anything. He's one of the main 911
conspiracy nuts who claim it was the govt that blew up the
pentagon and WTC. As such, he's lending support to the
muslim extremists and ****ing on the memories of those
lost.



But most of his message is lost on Le Pubic.
* Iffin you cain't grok the implication of about 20 special interest
lobbyists -- with pockets BULGING with $100 bills and blank checks -- for
EACH legislator in washington (and your state/city level legislators), then
Alex Jones will go waaaay over yer head.

Given that an alarming fraction of Le Pubic will fork over substantial
assets to slithering TeleEvangelists preaching an incoherent and utterly
philistinic Prosperity Gospel, the very simple notion of *utterly corrupt
dog'n'pony Congress(es) (city/state/federal) is way beyond Le Pubes' reading
level.

So, ultimately, Alex Jones, while admirable, is moot.
--
EA


After posting the incoherent ramble above, I'm left wondering...
Did you leave you puter on and someone else type away?
Or are you the one who is on drugs?