Thread
:
Calif says "not so fast" to oil changes
View Single Post
#
82
Posted to alt.home.repair
Steve Barker[_6_]
external usenet poster
Posts: 1,733
Calif says "not so fast" to oil changes
On 12/19/2011 3:32 PM,
wrote:
It was NOT Multi-Vis oil that killed your cam, it was a defective cam.
It was not an unheard of problem
ACTUALLY, it WAS determined to be the multi-vis oil that caused the
failure. It was not the failure of the camshaft. It was determined
(very early on in the 6.9 days) that the multi-vis oils were reverting
back to their "thin" properties during extended idling periods.
(ambulance use was real hard on them) and what was happening was that
the oil was actually being over cooled and would cool to the point to
form condensation (while running) and the fine little needle bearings on
the roller lifters would RUST. I know , hard to believe, but then the
resulting failure of these little needle bearings would cause the roller
to seize, and consequentially, the cam would be ruined. My particular
vehicle was not an ambulance, but i never shut it off in the winter and
thusly had mucho idle time. Of course, my truck was an '85, (only 2
years into this engines use) and the official determination didn't come
out until about the same time as this failure. I've never used anything
except straight 30 in everything i own since.
--
Steve Barker
remove the "not" from my address to email
Reply With Quote
Steve Barker[_6_]
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Steve Barker[_6_]