On Dec 8, 6:12*pm, "PrecisionmachinisT"
wrote:


Just because one does not need any journalistic qualifications to call
himself a "journalist" does not provide immunity to libel suits.



I do not think that being affiliated with one of the media, being paid
for articles written , and calling himself a journalist, provides any
immunity from libel suits. Don't newpapers get sued for libel?


*One does not need any education in the field, no
affiliation with a news outlet, no proving of any standards.

Not to argue with the village idiot, but in order to enjoy the protections
normally reserved for those affiliated with news outlets on the list of
recognized media including newspapers, magazines, television and radio news,
and motion pictures, then it would only seem logical that one should be
required to demonstrate some sort of credentials identifying himself as
having an affiliation with one or more news outlets that are on the list of
recognized media, including newspapers, magazines, television and radio
news, and motion pictures.



In short an ordinary person does not need any journalistic
qualifications to be a journalist.

Tell it to the judge....