harry wrote:
On Nov 1, 8:37 am, Andy Burns wrote:
Dave Liquorice wrote:
I don't think Harry has ever seriously pushed "saving the planet". It
is purely a financial investment with a "guaranteed" return
Given they've cut the subsidy much further and earlier than was planned,
here's hoping they cut the duration from 25 years to 10 or less.

Ah more envy/sour grapes. I bet you sit in the house on benifits.

Not even benefits, I am sure.

The fact remains harry that you are

- doing nothing to save the planet
- making money out of a totally unproductive scam
- making that money from people who have too much social responsibility
to copy your greed.

In short by any standard, you are a spiv and a social parasite.