On 10/8/2011 9:43 AM, RicodJour wrote:
On Oct 8, 3:54 am, "Bob-tx"No Spam no contact wrote:

Here are thirteen demands from those occupying Wall Street presented to
Obama.

{snipped a massive amount of bull****}

http://www.teapartytribune.com/2011/...treet-has-issu...

So, let me see if I understand you - for information on a "liberal"
fringe group, you turn to a "conservative" fringe group for
information. That about sum it up?

That makes as much sense as asking Iran for information on the US. Or
asking hee haw harry for information on the US. It just _might_ have
a little spin on it, ya know? Sheesh.


The media is pointing out that there AREN'T any clear cut demands
being made. It confuses people, as illustrated by your knee-jerk
post.

This is what Occupy Wall St has to say on the matter:
http://occupywallst.org/forum/propos...all-st-moveme/

"Proposed List Of Demands For Occupy Wall St Movement! (User
Submitted)

Posted Sept. 25, 2011, 3:46 p.m. EST (12 days ago) by anonymous

Admin note: This is not an official list of demands. This is a forum
post submitted by a single user and hyped by irresponsible news/
commentary agencies like Fox News and Mises.org. This content was not
published by the OccupyWallSt.org collective, nor was it ever proposed
or agreed to on a consensus basis with the NYC General Assembly. There
is NO official list of demands."

Well, **** - that's kind of odd. ANONYMOUS posts something on an open
forum, so it MUST be true. There couldn't possibly be anyone that
would, gasp!, lie and post some bull**** to get knee-jerks riled up,
could there?


Fair and balanced means you get information from many sides and figure
out who is closest to the 'truth' of the matter. No one owns truth.

R
Some people can't fathom the idea of getting info from many sides and
formulating their own opinion.