"Ian Field" wrote in message
...

"John Larkin" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 2 May 2011 15:16:31 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:

For nailing the evil ******* Bin Laden.

Dumping his remains in the sea was a nice touch - but doing it while he
was
still alive would have been much better.


We should have packed him in pork fat and buried him in a landfill in
New Jersey.


Dumped at sea is much better - the perfect location for a place of
pilgrimage.

Please pardon that I am skeptical that the evil ******* is actually gone.
President Obama is likely using this as a publicity stunt for re-election.
If George Bush had done this, the investigations would already be underway -
particularly about the woman that was supposedly used as a human shield by
Bin Laden and killed. The liberal (idiotic) press just seems to love the
president.
And dumped at sea? That's more like, "let's hide the evidence so nobody
can actually check the facts." Now they say that there is DNA evidence...
Compared against WHAT?

I'm not big on conspiracy theories but this one seems to have more questions
than answers to it.

Oppie
Peace on Earth - Ban the 'Bama