flipper wrote:

On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 01:38:37 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
? wrote:

?
?flipper wrote:
??
?? On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 00:11:19 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
?? ? wrote:
??
?? ?
?? ?flipper wrote:
?? ??
?? ?? On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 20:43:31 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
?? ?? ? wrote:
?? ??
?? ?? ?
?? ?? ?flipper wrote:
?? ?? ??
?? ?? ?? On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 18:05:45 -0700, Jim Thompson
?? ?? ?? ? wrote:
?? ?? ??
?? ?? ?? ?On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 18:34:31 -0600, flipper ? wrote:
?? ?? ?? ?
?? ?? ?? ??On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 17:23:27 -0700, Jim Thompson
?? ?? ?? ? wrote:
?? ?? ?? ??
?? ?? ?? ???On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 18:16:26 -0600, flipper ? wrote:
?? ?? ?? ???
?? ?? ?? ????On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:40:29 -0700, Jim Thompson
?? ?? ?? ? wrote:
?? ?? ?? ????
?? ?? ?? ?????On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 19:35:07 -0600, flipper ? wrote:
?? ?? ?? ?????
?? ?? ?? ?????snip?
?? ?? ?? ????
?? ?? ?? ??????
?? ?? ?? ??????Yes. What's wrong with phenolic in this application?
?? ?? ?? ??????
?? ?? ?? ???????
?? ?? ?? ???????In the future I may just layout a smaller version of my IC breadboard
?? ?? ?? ???????scheme and get it made on one of the PCB websites.
?? ?? ?? ???????
?? ?? ?? ??????? ...Jim Thompson
?? ?? ?? ?????
?? ?? ?? ?????In my Dad's TV shop I saw so many phenolic failures I'm just resistant
?? ?? ?? ?????;-)
?? ?? ?? ????
?? ?? ?? ????Good point, if you were making a 1960's TV
?? ?? ?? ????
?? ?? ?? ????
?? ?? ?? ????? ...Jim Thompson
?? ?? ?? ???
?? ?? ?? ???My Dad's trucks featured a sign, "We Don't Service Muntz" ;-)
?? ?? ?? ??
?? ?? ?? ??LOL
?? ?? ?? ??
?? ?? ?? ??Well, they didn't call him "Madman" Muntz for nothing, you know.
?? ?? ?? ??
?? ?? ?? ???
?? ?? ?? ??? ...Jim Thompson
?? ?? ?? ?
?? ?? ?? ?He serviced them for awhile. Then customers started complaining that
?? ?? ?? ?my Dad did poor service... as soon as the tubes aged, the reception
?? ?? ?? ?degenerated. So he dumped Muntz altogether.
?? ?? ??
?? ?? ?? Yeah, I knew exactly what his sign meant and why. Muntz TV sets had
?? ?? ?? barely enough parts to work at all, which is why they were uber cheap.
?? ?? ??
?? ?? ?? "There's something about a Muntz." You be there was; it's only one
?? ?? ?? step above junk.
?? ?? ?
?? ?? ?
?? ?? ? Above?
?? ??
?? ?? Sure. Out of the box they usually worked for 'some' period of time.
?? ?? That's a bit better than junk.
?? ?
?? ?
?? ? I never saw on 'just out of the box'. Like Packard Bell, we didn't
?? ?see them in our area till they WERE junk.
??
?? Well, just about everything ends up there sooner or later but Muntz
?? TVs started off closer to the heap.
?
?
? I only saw one of them, but that was enough. It looked like it was
?built from pre W.W. II surplus.

Could be, I suppose, but WWII surplus seems a lot more likely as the
country was darn near swimming in the stuff there for a while.


Let's just say I received better quality surplus components by the
pound from PolyPaks, Meshna and other places in the early '70s.


--
You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a band-aid on it, because it's
Teflon coated.