On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 12:58:03 -0400, George wrote:

On 10/2/2011 12:28 PM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 09:09:11 -0400, wrote:

On 10/1/2011 1:34 PM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:23:44 -0400, wrote:

On 10/1/2011 1:06 PM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 07:41:01 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Sep 30, 11:18 am, Red wrote:
BoA heads up a cast of characters.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Bank-o...-5-apf-1381425...

Picture Summary:http://oi54.tinypic.com/vx1amv.jpg

Looks like we need to go ahead and get our concealed carry permits so
we can carry more cash.

No need to carry cash. ;-)

Yes, it does make a lot more sense to say buy a donut using a credit or
debit card to help the banks out.

Wwwwwooooooosssssh!!

You are easily confused aren't you?

No, but they must call you "Shorty". It *still* hasn't sunk in.

So why not demonstrate your imagined intellectual superiority and simply
explain your position instead of issuing goofy comments and ad hominem
attacks?

Good grief! READ!

There is no need to carry cash to get a concealed carry permit. I have one
(though I sometimes carry a little cash - there's $1000 in my wallet now).

We walked into a bank earlier this week to get a cashiers check for
$10K for a car purchase. The account we were removing the money from
was NOT small.

I'm sure the dealer was happy. ;-)

Or it was a win-win. You can get better prices if you make cash part of
the negotiation because the dealer knows the tribute they will need to
pay to the bank.

Cash handling isn't free either.

Of course not but you are just parroting the FUD used by banks. If you
ever get a chance to see actual merchant costs you would be quite
surprised. Even common sense and simple observation will give you a good
idea.

FUD? No, I'm tall enough to see a tree in the forest. ...and ,no, I wouldn't
be surprised, Shorty. You shouldn't speak of which you haven't a clue. IOW,
be mute.

Not everyone loves banks.

Not everyone loves lawyers or dentists either.

Sure, but I am confident lawyyers and dentists weren't part of the team
that tanked the economy.

I didn't think they made people that short. ...and stupid.

Ad hominem attacks just make the issuer look clueless. Was that your
intention?

Just the facts, Shorty.