On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:44:51 +0700, john B.
wrote:



Given the Republican's apparent efforts to block whatever the
President does it is logical to think that if there was any real doubt
that he was unqualified to serve that they would not have been all
over it. But they haven't.

If, during the primaries, it could have been proved that he was
ineligible to serve how much would the Clinton's paid to make that
public. But they haven't.

If the Birthers actually have proof that Obama was not born in the
U.S. one has to wonder why they haven't presented it to a court of
law. But they haven't.

Cheers,

John B.


Johnny...they have indeed presented it to many courts of law. And nearly
ALL of the courts have refused to hear it. Would you want to be the
judge that was responsible for the removal of a US president?

Several courts have not refused to hear it..and have ruled that the
state of Hawaii is required to present Obamas birth cert.

So far..Hawaii has....refused.

For someone who posts..you sure dont seem to know much about the
subject.

Odd that, eh wot?

Gunner

--
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry
capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency.
It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an
Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense
and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have
such a man for their? president.. Blaming the prince of the
fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of
fools that made him their prince".