On 8/15/2011 10:44 AM, Hawke wrote:
On 8/15/2011 12:25 AM, Don Foreman wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:46:21 -0700, Hawke
wrote:


What really smells is the idea that now almost 40 years after Vietnam
ended he can't release his "classified" information. I guess his top
secret information will have to wait until fifty years after his death
until it can be unsealed and released to the public. Yeah, his "secrets"
would jeopardize national security so they have to remain sealed.
Bull****!

Hawke

The classification of some events has nothing to do with national
security. It's all about political and top-level ass-covering. There
are some things that will never come to light. They can't be undone
and those to blame, if those who weren't there would assign blame,
have retired or died.


Do you really believe that events such as you are talking about have any
connection to Mark Weiber of Taft, Ca.? That he's a person who would
have information that top level people, if they are even still alive,
would want to keep secret? I think you're giving credit where it's not
warranted. The most likely thing is that Gummer is spinning another
yarn, not that he actually is the keeper of critical information that no
one else has. Think about that. He's got information that has never come
to light since Vietnam and he's still keeping it safe all these years
later? Come on. Don't you know a bull**** story when you hear one? I
thought you had some life experience.

wieberdouche's entire yarn is bull**** - pure "stolen valor" bull****.