On Apr 29, 4:50*am, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 02:54:40 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"

wrote:
Gunner Asch wrote:

Odd...it certainly doesnt look like its lighter..and it sure looked
like it was pixelized unlike all the other numbers/letters.

It became pixelated because it was lighter. *It's a black and white copier
after all (using colored paper) so anything gray has to be pixelated.

Ah..no. *It wont.



Why would it be the only pixilized charector in that string?

It's the only one that's lighter.

Ah..no.



In your opinion..could that number have been added to the
document..exchanged for another charector?

Sure it could be, in which case it would be identical to another digit, and
not unique as it is. *If it was modified, pixels on its edges would be
changed between black and white, not black and gray.

Correct. *So why are the other charectors nice and clear..and that one
shows very definate pixilization. And its not because its "lighter"



Why is it pixilized?

There was a smudge on the copier glass.

That guy knows nothing, and he sounds so sure.

Answer the above questions if you would be so kind. Its obvious that
you are an expert in Adobe.

If you're an expert in forgery methods tell me how it would result in
looking like a copy made through smudged glass.

Because the center was cut and pasted onto the raw paper format.
Afterall..copy machines print in (1) layer. This file has (9) seperate
and individual layers, as do anything that was manufactured using
software and pasted together.

As I recall..one of the investigators determined it was something run on
a Mac.



Please let us know

No trouble.

Still waiting for signs of your expertise. So far..its not obvious. Care
to try again?

Gunner



Guunner (or any of thje rest of you conspiracy theorists)

Skipping all the other bull****, please answer one simple question:
Where do you buy gray toner for your copier?

If you can't answer that, your arguments just kind of fall apart,
don't they?