On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:34:51 -0500, "Paul K. Dickman"
wrote:


"Gunner Asch" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 14:03:21 -0500, "Paul K. Dickman"
wrote:


"Gunner Asch" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:25:16 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
wrote:

rangerssuck wrote:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/...th-certificate

"It may have been good politics and good TV, but it was bad for the
American
people and distracting from the many challenges we face as a country."

It certainly distracted a lot of people from his genuine shortcomings,
so
thanks a lot birthers.

So..is it a forgery or is it real?
So lets see an actual Photocopy of the birth certificate. You do know
that the above..is not a photocopy, dontcha?


It is a photocopy, you moron.

What it "isn't", is a Photostat. A process that made negative copies.

Paul K. Dickman

Photostat..ok. So its NOT a photostat of the actual document. Correct?

Odd how its all green and everything. Were things printed on green paper
in 1961?


Once again, you moron.
The green part isn't the part that is copied,
it is the paper it is copied onto.
It is green safety copier paper.

Paul K. Dickman

Id rather like to see the original...it would be far far more
belivable.

Afterall..the Democrat Gov of Hawaii said it couldnt be found.....

So I take it you voted for Obama, given all the frothing you are doing
about the questioning if its real or not.

So hows that Hopey/Changey thingy working out for you?


Gunner

--
"If I say two plus two is four and a Democrat says two plus two is eight,
it's not a partial victory for me when we agree that two plus two is
six. " Jonah Goldberg (modified)