Gunner Asch wrote:

So..is it a forgery or is it real?
So lets see an actual Photocopy of the birth certificate. You do know
that the above..is not a photocopy, dontcha?

Obviously it isn't a photocopy, but they could forge that too. Interesting
how even the signatures are duplicated on paper that didn't exist at the
time. The proper approach from the start would have been for an independent
media (which we don't have) to go and look for it, but they rushed off to
Alaska instead.


This is what they are supposed to look like...G

http://www.wnd.com/images/090728birthcert.gif

That's what I got.


Yall do understand..that if its a fraudulant document..the Obamassiah
will be impeached and imprisoned faster than a fart floats...right?

No he won't be. This is a long way from having 5 women testify that he
raped them.

It's even a long way from having 950 personal FBI files sent to the White
House, one of which got Nixon one of his 5 articles of impeachment. That's
950 articles of impeachment to Nixon's 5. And Nixon's said it didn't matter
if he knew about it because he was responsible anyway.

So you can't seriously believe he'll be impeached.

You're wasting time that should be spent getting him voted out for things we
know, instead of impeached for things we're not sure of.


And while we are at it....how about all of his school records?

If they start at age 5 that wouldn't prove he was born here, while we know
that his formative years were in a country that wouldn't allow us to put a
carrier in their harbor when we were trying to bring them aid after a
tsunami. So he didn't learn much about the US there. This is where the
focus should have been. Along with his attitude woward private business
(enemy territory) expessed in his memoirs. And the fact that his abortion
position is to the left of NARAL, because NARAL had no objection to
requiring doctors to give life support to babies born alive during a failed
abortion. What a mindset this guy has.


In 1990, Obama beat out 18 other contenders to become the first black
president of the Harvard Law Review, where he spent at least 50 hours
a week editing submissions from judges, scholars and authors.

When did he go to class?

The rest of it is nothing compared to what was overlooked in the Clinton
years. It's a waste of time.


--

Reply in group, but if emailing add one more
zero, and remove the last word.