On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 07:29:21 -0800 (PST), Jethro wrote:

Warning signs are *not* a defence against a claim of negligence - what
if the trespasser couldn't read them ? (which is what the high court
ruled, years ago).

Pictogram?

Surely one only has to take "reasonable" steps to warn trespassers?

--
Cheers
Dave.