On Jan 1, 7:01 pm, Skipweasel wrote:
In article 60fa87d8-100d-429a-85e1-5c94eaaf4464
@l8g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

Google finds a few, but they don't seem as thin - the difference between
using 1.0mm and 0.8mm was considerable.

20% maybe ;)

Seemed a lot more - I doubt the difference is linear.

seems straight forward enough - same power angle grinder, same disc
size, 2 X disc sides, reduced disc thickness of 20%, ergo 20% less
material being removed, erm.... what have I missed?

Jim K