View Single Post
  #9   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
Gunner Asch[_6_] Gunner Asch[_6_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,399
Default Aerating coolant, do I need a "stone" or not

On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 07:39:15 -0600, Karl Townsend
wrote:

On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 21:23:22 -0800, "Steve B"
wrote:


"Ignoramus18625" wrote in message
om...
I finally visited Wal-Mart and bought two timers. I want to run the
skimmer off of one timer, and aerator (fishtank style air pump) on
another timer.

My question is, do I need a stone on the aerator, or not. I am
concerned that the stone will eventually become plugged by coolant
residue. If bubbling water without a stone is a little less efficient,
I do not think that I care too much.

Any thoughts on this?

i


Do the math, ig. Finer bubbles make for more surface area to transfer
gases. I use a stone when aerating my wort (beer cooked in the first phase)
with oxygen. It helps the yeast to work better. What are you aerating
coolant for?


My thinking was just the opposite. Its in the back corner of the sump
with its main job to push oil to the skimmer. No way to see if the
stone plugs, and it will. If your stone plugs and you don't catch it,
you're in for a totally awful job of cleaning a putrid sump.

Always more than one way to skin a cat.

Karl


Actually...the air bubbles are to kill anerobic bacteria...bugs that
grow without Oxygen and when they die..the sludge that is left behind
breaks down easily enough.

But maybe Im wrong?

Gunner

--
"Confiscating wealth from those who have earned it, inherited it,
or got lucky is never going to help 'the poor.' Poverty isn't
caused by some people having more money than others, just as obesity
isn't caused by McDonald's serving super-sized orders of French fries
Poverty, like obesity, is caused by the life choices that dictate
results." - John Tucci,