"John Rumm" wrote in message
...
On 18/11/2010 19:30, dennis@home wrote:


"John Rumm" wrote in message
...

Not in the last 20 years... As to "so what?", don't you feel any
responsibility to contribute accurate information if you are going to
post your opinion as fact on public fora?

If i were answering a question then yes I would try to be accurate,
that's why I don't answer questions when I don't know anything about it.

There seems to be some 1984 esq revisionism going on here. In case you
forget, you were answering a question, and now by your own admission it
was on something you don't know much about.

What question was I answering?


When its general discussion then so what? Anyone can be wrong and it
would be just as foolish to base anything critical on one unknown
persons statements as it would to rely on a stranger in the pub.

So you seem to be saying we should treat your proclamations with the same
degree of respect as those of any unknown stranger in a pub?

If you want to quote a subset then I suppose its true even if its somewhat
limited.