In message , "dennis@home"
writes


"geoff" wrote in message
...

Of course its avoiding it,

Not in the evasive sense that you are implying

I never implied anything, if you want to change avoided to evaded than
its you that is implying something.
I expect its because you have been trying to evade it and think someone
thinks you have making you read stuff into posts that haven't been said.

Is that a direct accusation denise?

Watch your step



who said that it was wrong to do so?

You were implying it

No I wasn't.
I would have said evaded if I meant evaded.


Do you have a guilty feeling?

I am VAT registered, I have been for 18 years

I've had a VAT visit, no problems, It's left to the accountant


Oh look you have accidentally snipped the bit where I asked you to
confirm that you were wrong

And I will continue to do so.
Anyone who has read what i said will know I agree with what the IR have
said.
The fact that it winds you up for me not to say what you want me to say
is a good enough reason not to.

BTW if I wanted to wriggle I would point out that we no longer run
value added tax as the system was "simplified" a few years ago and it
is now not a value added tax system at all but just a purchase tax
system. Some states do operate a value added tax system ASFAIAA.


You said

"Incidentally claiming VAT back on stuff that is not passed on to a
third party is also fraud."

Which is patently wrong and displays a total lack of understanding of
how VAT works

I posted a quote from the HMRC site

"Generally, you can reclaim VAT that you pay when you buy goods or
services for your business. This VAT is called input tax by HMRC"

which shows you are wrong

You just don't have the backbone to admit it

but then ... you're a dickhead who bought an induction hob and didn't
realise how it worked as well

how many other threads are there going at the moment where your
stupidity has come to light?



--
geoff