JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"HeyBub" wrote in message
...
DGDevin wrote:
To liberals, ending the war is the goal (for reasons passing
understanding), so the loss of a few lives is irrelevant.
You mean like the loss of 4,400+ American lives (not to mention those
of allies and Iraqis) for the goal of finding WMDs that didn't exist?
Just how immoral an act is starting a war on false pretenses?
We NEED a war every ten to fifteen years to keep the tip of the spear
sharp.


That's cool. But we need new rules. Any elected slob who votes for a war -
all their eligible living relatives go into combat first, and they're given
the most dangerous possible jobs. The ones no soldier wants.



Why make the relatives suffer just because they are unlucky enough to
have a politician in the family? I say we bring back the custom of the
kings and general leading from the front lines.

--
aem sends...