On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 21:50:11 -0700, "Bill Noble"
wrote:



"cavelamb" wrote in message
...
Sunworshipper wrote:

Doesn't it say up front in the constitution that the boarders must be
secure? Or when the pres. accepts the job? I say it is dereliction of
duty, congress, jud, & EX. ! Punishable to stripped of all wealth
documents and whatever then sent to ahhh Mexico City.

SW

P. S. Good luck with that. Better yet China LOL


That's actually a small point in international law.
A nation that can not secure its borders cannot maintain its sovereignty.

Ask Cambodia - back in the 1970's.



the question is not securing the borders, the question is, are you willing
to pay for it. securing the land border is trivial - just place machine gun
nests along the border and offer a bounty of 1000 for every kill - and pay
some reasonable wage. But the problem is that the people who want secure
borders the most are the ones that whine about high taxes when we are really
a very low tax nation, and I am not sure I want to live in a country that
uses force that way - but it will work - East Germany used that method quite
effectively.

In some states, regular public executions remind people what is forbidden -
we could adopt that practice - but do we want to? What is the price we are
willing to pay? Think this through before you make policy decisions of this
type.


We could simply pay a bounty on the dead, and once a day, have score
keepers wander the killing zone on the border tallying up the body
counts.

It would be a win win situation and far far cheaper than having the
government actually get off its fat, bloated, dead Leftwing ass and
actually do something about it.

Gunner

One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
Gunner Asch